189 REPUBS WANT TO TORTURE (Jesus would be proud)

 

 What is the definition of HYPOCRIT ?

WHEN WILL THE VOTERS FINALLY CATCH ON ABOUT THEIR LEADERS?  OR…..WHEN WILL THEY CATCH ON ABOUT….THEMSELVES.

 

189 Republicans Affirm Their Support of Torture

By The Xsociate , The All Spin Zone
Posted on December 14, 2007, Printed on December 16, 2007
http://www.alternet.org/bloggers/http://allspinzone.com/wp//70640/

I’m back to my one trick pony propensity again but given the serious of the subject matter — the subjection to and potential cover up of the torture of US detainees — I feel a bit of harping is warranted. But as with most things the Congress does these days, they just aren’t thinking far enough ahead.

Yesterday, the House took the advice of a phalanx of retired Army and Navy officers to ignoring President Bush’s threat to veto and passed by a ban on the practice of waterboarding.

The House approved legislation yesterday that would bar the CIA from using waterboarding and other harsh interrogation tactics, drawing an immediate veto threat from the White House and setting up another political showdown over what constitutes torture.

The measure, approved by a largely party-line vote of 222 to 199, would require U.S. intelligence agencies to follow Army rules adopted last year that explicitly forbid waterboarding. It also would require interrogators to adhere to a strict interpretation of the Geneva Conventions on the treatment of prisoners of war. The rules, required by Congress for all Defense Department personnel, also ban sexual humiliation, “mock” executions and the use of attack dogs, and prohibit the withholding of food and medical care.

The measure still must make it through the Senate, which given that some members have already signaled their willingness to downplay even the most heinous of practices, remains very much in doubt.

But even if it were to reach full passage, it would be — as my post title suggests — utterly meaningless. For you see the Congress has already affirmed such a ban. It was a little thing called the Detainee Treatment Act of 2005. And we all remember how long that “ban” lasted (hint: as long as it took the ink to dry on the “Only if I want to” note Bush attached to it).

So while we can applaud Congress for once again seeking to clear up the issue of just which practices are acceptable, if past is prologue, this latest affirmation won’t matter one bit.

More from DHinMI and Carpetbagger.

The Xsociate is a blogger for the All Spin Zone

© 2007 Independent Media Institute. All rights reserved.
View this story online at: http://www.alternet.org/bloggers/http://allspinzone.com/wp//70640/
Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: