URGENT: Do not give your kids vaccines.

Kids Vaccine Linked to Fever, Seizures

Posted: 2008-02-27 20:48:52
ATLANTA (AP) – Children suffered higher rates of fever-related convulsions when they got a Merck & Co. combination vaccine instead of two separate shots, according to a new study presented Wednesday.
Do you own any of Satan’s stock?

DEAR VACCINE PANEL : Leave us the hell alone !

All Kids Must Get Flu Vaccine, Panel Says

By Maggie Fox,
Posted: 2008-02-27 19:58:55
Filed Under: Health News
WASHINGTON (Feb. 28) – All U.S. children aged from six months up to 18 should be immunized every year against influenza, a panel of federal vaccine advisers said on Wednesday.
Please click the link and go register your vote against this insanity. I wouldn’t let this government touch me or my kids with a ten foot pole anymore. You gotta be kidding me. I pulled my own children out of school for homeschooling over mandated vaccines. Oh, and the fake history and science they teach.

The Real Barak Obama ?

WHO IS BARAK HUSSEIN OBAMA – 117 H  –  234 V  –  351 HV……….
This matches The Great Pyramid of Giza precisely.
BARA K    THIS IS ARAB 11  (look at it bkwrds)
K = 11
The bkwrds alphabet includes the C that is omitted in the fwa.
I have already posted some of those findings. Barak Obama aligns deeply with the Mormon church numerically, and the Illuminati, which includes The Scottish Rite. I am not seeing in the numbers someone who is truly aligned with light for the Jewish community. I am seeing Egypt and Arab. And Mormons. Which sheds some light on Mormons (again).  There is no other church Barak aligns with. The first Mormon church was called THE CHURCH OF CHRIST. Barak’s church is United Church of Christ and they recently honored Louis Farakan.
One of Barak’s biggest successes in the Senate he co-sponsored with Orin Hatch, of Utah,  for the protection of church tithings in the Banckruptcy bill. At the same time, he accidently voted against children’s health care in Illinois. He was called on it and asked that the record be corrected.  This happened on other occassions.  His zip code is 666 and is the same zip code for BOEING’S INTL HEADQRTS.  Think planes. It’s all about the planes my friend.  The new Boeing Dreamliner is called 777.  The PYRAMID # FOR LATTER DAY SAINTS IS 777. Think Vegas with it’s slot machines. Think Area 51 and money laundering.
You need to knowthat Barak Obama could be a TROJAN HORSE.
That is the last time I am saying it.
When you vote for someone you are actually making a covenant with them.
It matters.
B is for Blessing
This has been at the heart of every Jewish Sabbath meal since Abraham. It was a vital part of the early church composed of Jewish converts. The Hebrew for ‘blessing’ (barak) means to ‘empower to strength’. When we gather we should seek God’s blessing and then to pass that blessing on to members of our community.

Blog article by flazna


Date Thursday, February 7th 2008, 3:45 AM Icon 12 Date 0I would like to remind all who call themselves Christian that
it is your first and foremost responsibility to seek God as to
who He wants as President. He has to listen to the same crap
lies. He does however say to pray for those who are in
leadership, not against them, so here is what God told the
Prophet Joe.

He said since I have you writing things about the Hebrew
language and you know nothing about the Hebrew language, then
look up the names of the runners in Hebrew. The only one who
comes close to a Hebrew name I could trust is the one whose
name matches the one blessing.
Barak atai adonai elohenu or Blessed are you oh Lord.

Bamah means to be high or elevated.
Barak O Bamah means Blessed is the most high God.
~Prophet Joe Dooly, Miami, AZ~


I had to check this so I looked it up in my Hebrew dictionary.
Here are the full Hebrew dictionary meanings.

1288. barak, baw-rak’; a prim. root; to kneel; by impl. to
bless God (as an act of adoration), and (vice-versa) man (as a
benefit); also (by euphemism) to curse (God or the king, as
treason):– X abundantly, X altogether, X at all, blaspheme,
bless, congratulate, curse, X greatly, X indeed, kneel (down),
praise, salute, X still, thank.

1116. bamah, baw-maw’; from an unused root (mean. to be high);
an elevation:–height, high place, wave.

NOTE FROM SHEREE :  111 X 6 = 666
 BARAK O BAMAH  means Blessed is the most high God (hebrew)
BARAK O BAMAH =  37 H —-  73 V —-   110 HV
The word Barak means BLESSED
Backwards alphabet BLESSED =  556 hv
The difference is 110
110 = President  (using reg alphabet)
Backwards alphabet  GOD =  10 h    55 v   65 hv
They use the forward number added to the bakcward number:
10 + 01 = 11
55 + 55 + 110   (another 11)
11 + 11 = 22
65 + 56  = 121  = ANTICHRIST v  – THIS IS  6-556
You already know what 22 is.
bama   mabus
the ending us is  U.S.
M A  is  131 expression when assigning numbers under letters.
  ….which is 13 going backwards and forward.
It’s all about 13.

Why doesn’t Russert ask them about Blackwater, and Spying On Our Citzens, and Oil Profits, and Impeachment and ….

We have had a gazillion debates with the same old tired questions, but none relating to EXACTLY what will impact this country more than anything else. THE LOSS OF OUR CIVIL LIBERTIES. Oh, and our ignorance.

 We just keep going along like good little sheep. They don’t ask, because they are WARNED not to ask.

Wake the hell up. Is anyone begging to talk to the people about these things. Asking for some air time on these things. Hell no. We are idiots that’s why.

Bush dances because he doesn’t care.

What kind of humanoid doesn’t care? How could he actually be out dancing? Who does that in times he’s created? Why doesn’t he just go over to Arlington and dance on the graves. Maybe he does under the cover of night.

But, see – this post, and all the others hurts him not. It actually makes him gleeful. He feeds off the hatred people have for him. He salivates at the thought you can’t stand him. That is how he is able to dance. Don’t let sweet Laura fool you. There is much you don’t know. This is a woman pushing the HPV vaccine hot and heavy. The greatest evil to come along for women EVER. But, she gets on TV and tells us to take our medicine like good little 11 year olds.


Why does he dance when everyone else is crying?

You don’t know do you.

Well, there are lots of people who do know. They are in Congress. They give him everything he wants. Why do you suppose that is? Think.

You know don’t you.

John McCain’s about face on torture.



McCain Torture Endorsement Lost Amid Media Sex Scandal Frenzy


By Liliana Segura, AlterNet
Posted on February 22, 2008, Printed on February 22, 2008

Upon being confronted with The New York Times’ “bombshell” report of his too-cozy relationship with a “lady lobbyist” during his last presidential campaign, GOP contender John McCain took a page from the Bush playbook and blamed the media.

His spokesperson, Jill Hazelbacker, called it “a hit-and-run smear campaign.” McCain invoked his service to his country and issued a blunt denial: “Obviously I am very disappointed in The New York Times article,” he said. “It’s not true.” And in what might be her second public utterance since she piped up to say that she is very proud of her country, would-be First Lady Cindy McCain — who bears an eerie resemblance to the lobbyist in question — joined her husband at a press conference to say that she, too, was “very disappointed in The New York Times.”

“Americans are sick and tired of this kind of gutter politics,” Hazelbacker declared in an official statement.

Maybe so — but you can’t say the same for the media. Just when it looked like McCain was comfortably, boringly, settling into his role as GOP nominee, a sexy front-pager broke that would not only spice things up, it would give the press a chance to drop everything and indulge in a little journalistic naval-gazing.

Hours after the Times posted its story Wednesday night, The Washington Post followed with its own version of a politician-meets-lobbyist tale told amid fundraising venues and inside private jets. AlterNet’s Joshua Holland provides the sordid summary:

“The heart of the Times (and Washington Post) story is that staffers became concerned that McCain, the Patron Saint of Straight-Shooterdom, was overly cozy with a lobbying hottie — a lobbyist whose clients had business before a committee McCain chaired — and warned her off of the Senator’s campaign. That comes from a named source, John Weaver, who says he was personally present at a meeting with (Vicki) Iseman, and personally warned her off.”

The blogosphere lit up overnight, and following McCain’s 9 a.m. press conference, every talking head on television was weighing in on the McCain “sex scandal” — a scandal that ultimately has precious little to do with sex, given that the Times fell short of proving anything actually happened between McCain and Iseman.

In some ways, McCain is right: The media should be blamed — but not just for shoddy reporting of a rather sexless scandal. They should be castigated for ignoring a much more important and damning story about the so-called principled maverick — one that has actual implications for American democracy.

Mere hours before The New York Times broke its story on Wednesday, McCain made a totally unrelated — and apparently un-newsworthy — statement to reporters, in which he called for President Bush to veto the Senate’s anti-torture bill. He talked in support of “additional techniques” for interrogation, sounding ever more in line with the White House’s official stance. McCain, the “war hero” who has been an outspoken opponent of torture, voted against the bill, which would restrict the CIA to some 19 interrogation techniques listed in the Army field manual.

Now, having passed the Senate, the bill is headed for a veto at the hands of President Bush. For a man who would be president — and who is practically giddy at the prospect of being Commander in Chief — McCain’s push for a veto is ominous.

His evolving position on torture should be deeply troubling — much moreso than the current scandal. Yet it has received a fraction of the media attention that has already been devoted to whatever he did or did not do with a blonde lobbyist eight years ago.

Meanwhile, right-wing McCain supporters and critics alike are making so much noise chattering about family values and attacking the Times, McCain’s about-face on torture is likely to stay buried.

In fact, “the Times story may have succeeded in accomplishing what politics itself could not,” observed The Atlantic‘s Marc Ambiner, “unifying the conservative base around McCain by way of their visceral disgust with The New York Times and its lib-ber-ral politics.”

So how did this mess get started?

According to an article published Thursday afternoon in The New Republic, word got out about the Times‘ months-long investigation of McCain, so the publishing giant may have rushed to press to keep from getting scooped by another publication.

But that theory — ripped from the mouths of none other than McCain’s own advisers — is about as flimsy as the sex scandal itself.

Between right-wing howling against the Times and nerdy journalism gossip, the McCain fracas has largely become a story about a story. “We’re going to war with The New York Times,” the McCain camp announced the night the article broke. Robert Bennet, McCain’s lawyer, complained to Wolf Blitzer that he had sat down with reporters and shown them “10 to 12 instances” where McCain had refused to do her bidding — but those examples had remained conspicuously absent from the piece.

At least some in the media have acknowledged that, distilled to its base, there’s very little that’s news in this story — unless you actually bought into the myth that McCain is the straight-shooting, ethical politician he claims to be.

Yet the coverage continues. “I think we’re going to have a feeding frenzy for a day, maybe a day and a half, then it will go away because it’s a nothing story,” one McCain adviser said.

In contrast, no media feeding frenzy followed McCain’s vote against the anti-torture bill last week. It was forgotten faster than you could say “waterboarding.”

Of course, this is a “sex scandal.” Torture, by comparison, is old news.

© 2008 Independent Media Institute. All rights reserved.
View this story online at: http://www.alternet.org/story/77505/

25,000 Police in UK protest for backpay (video)

25,000 people took to the streets in London to protest POLICE PAY. No police peeps showed up – cept one.

Check out the video. Good for them. I mean now that they have elevated the stakes in this new world order, they should get a raise. It’s hard work to turn on your own people.