Bush dances because he doesn’t care.

What kind of humanoid doesn’t care? How could he actually be out dancing? Who does that in times he’s created? Why doesn’t he just go over to Arlington and dance on the graves. Maybe he does under the cover of night.

But, see – this post, and all the others hurts him not. It actually makes him gleeful. He feeds off the hatred people have for him. He salivates at the thought you can’t stand him. That is how he is able to dance. Don’t let sweet Laura fool you. There is much you don’t know. This is a woman pushing the HPV vaccine hot and heavy. The greatest evil to come along for women EVER. But, she gets on TV and tells us to take our medicine like good little 11 year olds.

MY GAWD !!!

Why does he dance when everyone else is crying?

You don’t know do you.

Well, there are lots of people who do know. They are in Congress. They give him everything he wants. Why do you suppose that is? Think.

You know don’t you.

Advertisements

John McCain’s about face on torture.

jetfueldees.jpg

 

McCain Torture Endorsement Lost Amid Media Sex Scandal Frenzy

 

By Liliana Segura, AlterNet
Posted on February 22, 2008, Printed on February 22, 2008
http://www.alternet.org/story/77505/

Upon being confronted with The New York Times’ “bombshell” report of his too-cozy relationship with a “lady lobbyist” during his last presidential campaign, GOP contender John McCain took a page from the Bush playbook and blamed the media.

His spokesperson, Jill Hazelbacker, called it “a hit-and-run smear campaign.” McCain invoked his service to his country and issued a blunt denial: “Obviously I am very disappointed in The New York Times article,” he said. “It’s not true.” And in what might be her second public utterance since she piped up to say that she is very proud of her country, would-be First Lady Cindy McCain — who bears an eerie resemblance to the lobbyist in question — joined her husband at a press conference to say that she, too, was “very disappointed in The New York Times.”

“Americans are sick and tired of this kind of gutter politics,” Hazelbacker declared in an official statement.

Maybe so — but you can’t say the same for the media. Just when it looked like McCain was comfortably, boringly, settling into his role as GOP nominee, a sexy front-pager broke that would not only spice things up, it would give the press a chance to drop everything and indulge in a little journalistic naval-gazing.

Hours after the Times posted its story Wednesday night, The Washington Post followed with its own version of a politician-meets-lobbyist tale told amid fundraising venues and inside private jets. AlterNet’s Joshua Holland provides the sordid summary:

“The heart of the Times (and Washington Post) story is that staffers became concerned that McCain, the Patron Saint of Straight-Shooterdom, was overly cozy with a lobbying hottie — a lobbyist whose clients had business before a committee McCain chaired — and warned her off of the Senator’s campaign. That comes from a named source, John Weaver, who says he was personally present at a meeting with (Vicki) Iseman, and personally warned her off.”

The blogosphere lit up overnight, and following McCain’s 9 a.m. press conference, every talking head on television was weighing in on the McCain “sex scandal” — a scandal that ultimately has precious little to do with sex, given that the Times fell short of proving anything actually happened between McCain and Iseman.

In some ways, McCain is right: The media should be blamed — but not just for shoddy reporting of a rather sexless scandal. They should be castigated for ignoring a much more important and damning story about the so-called principled maverick — one that has actual implications for American democracy.

Mere hours before The New York Times broke its story on Wednesday, McCain made a totally unrelated — and apparently un-newsworthy — statement to reporters, in which he called for President Bush to veto the Senate’s anti-torture bill. He talked in support of “additional techniques” for interrogation, sounding ever more in line with the White House’s official stance. McCain, the “war hero” who has been an outspoken opponent of torture, voted against the bill, which would restrict the CIA to some 19 interrogation techniques listed in the Army field manual.

Now, having passed the Senate, the bill is headed for a veto at the hands of President Bush. For a man who would be president — and who is practically giddy at the prospect of being Commander in Chief — McCain’s push for a veto is ominous.

His evolving position on torture should be deeply troubling — much moreso than the current scandal. Yet it has received a fraction of the media attention that has already been devoted to whatever he did or did not do with a blonde lobbyist eight years ago.

Meanwhile, right-wing McCain supporters and critics alike are making so much noise chattering about family values and attacking the Times, McCain’s about-face on torture is likely to stay buried.

In fact, “the Times story may have succeeded in accomplishing what politics itself could not,” observed The Atlantic‘s Marc Ambiner, “unifying the conservative base around McCain by way of their visceral disgust with The New York Times and its lib-ber-ral politics.”

So how did this mess get started?

According to an article published Thursday afternoon in The New Republic, word got out about the Times‘ months-long investigation of McCain, so the publishing giant may have rushed to press to keep from getting scooped by another publication.

But that theory — ripped from the mouths of none other than McCain’s own advisers — is about as flimsy as the sex scandal itself.

Between right-wing howling against the Times and nerdy journalism gossip, the McCain fracas has largely become a story about a story. “We’re going to war with The New York Times,” the McCain camp announced the night the article broke. Robert Bennet, McCain’s lawyer, complained to Wolf Blitzer that he had sat down with reporters and shown them “10 to 12 instances” where McCain had refused to do her bidding — but those examples had remained conspicuously absent from the piece.

At least some in the media have acknowledged that, distilled to its base, there’s very little that’s news in this story — unless you actually bought into the myth that McCain is the straight-shooting, ethical politician he claims to be.

Yet the coverage continues. “I think we’re going to have a feeding frenzy for a day, maybe a day and a half, then it will go away because it’s a nothing story,” one McCain adviser said.

In contrast, no media feeding frenzy followed McCain’s vote against the anti-torture bill last week. It was forgotten faster than you could say “waterboarding.”

Of course, this is a “sex scandal.” Torture, by comparison, is old news.

© 2008 Independent Media Institute. All rights reserved.
View this story online at: http://www.alternet.org/story/77505/

25,000 Police in UK protest for backpay (video)

25,000 people took to the streets in London to protest POLICE PAY. No police peeps showed up – cept one.

Check out the video. Good for them. I mean now that they have elevated the stakes in this new world order, they should get a raise. It’s hard work to turn on your own people.

 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=etoU8J07vyE

9/11/2001 = JESUS CHRIST EXACTLY

THE PRIMARY STRING FOR ANYTHING SEEMS TO BE THE HORIZONTAL  AND VERTICAL  READING, WHICH I CALL THE CROSS NUMBER. COVERS EAST WEST NORTH AND SOUTH.
EXAMPLE:
I AM 324 HV
324 WOULD BE MY PRIMARY ID.
___________________________
JESUS CHRIST = 221  HV         this is his primary ID
JESUS      29 H    74 V   103 HV
CHRIST   41 H     77 V   118 HV
____________________________
               70        151         221  HV
__________________________
THE NUMBERS 221  ARE PART OF 2012  (minues the zero) do yourself a big favor and google 2012.
9/11/2001  = 2021     221
9 + 11 + 2001  = 2021
221 is thee main number for JESUS CHRIST.
2021  is 2012  scrambled.  They do that a lot.
__________________________________
I’m sure that’s just a coincidence.  😉
Now you know a little more.
This is Jesus Christ Numerology.
Using the English alphabet  A= 1   B= 2  C= 3   etc.
Adding Horizontally – add ONE digit at a time across. NOT TWO.
Add vertical as you normally would.
Check it yourself or just be dumb some more.
__________________________________________
SIDE NOTE:
USING THE BACKWARDS ALPHABET:   Z= 1   Y = 2   ETC.
“WHICH NUMBER REPRESENTS JESUS CHRIST” = 666  HV
____________________________
Oh dear, is that your alarm clock going off?