PUBLIC SCHOOL IS NO PLACE FOR MY CHILD- PERIOD !

“Parents do not have a constitutional right to home school their children,” wrote Justice H. Walter Croskey in a Feb. 28 opinion signed by the two other members of the district court. “Parents who fail to [comply with school enrollment laws] may be subject to a criminal complaint against them, found guilty of an infraction, and subject to imposition of fines or an order to complete a parent education and counseling program.”

Read the rest of this  *&^%$#&^%^()&)(*% !!!!!!

http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me-homeschool6mar06,0,7343621.story

This is a very complicated issue for there are many *needs* in play that is bringing this to a head.

1)   vaccinations

      The Us Gov wants your daughter to have the HPV vaccine. I won’t go into why, cuz it will scare you. But, they can’t really do the job they need to do if they miss homeschoolers. And, they need ALL females in the next generation for their handywork.

2)  Teachers Unions

      Don’t even start !

3)   Afraid parents will teach kids the truth. The gov can’t control them as well.

4)   If kids are in school, they are far more likely to eat and drink toxic food and sugar drinks.

      Yeah, it’s evil, but so was/is Flouride.

5)   Because on the day they call martial law, they want the kiddies nice and safe in school.

      Now, that’s the really scary part.  Think about it. you have no idea what is coming do you.

6)   The rest is so damned evil, I can’t bare to write it down.

 People, you better make your voices heard on this issue. CALL YOUR STATE REPS AND

TELL THEM YOU WANT THE RIGHT THE EDUCATE YOUR CHILD AT HOME.

Scholar Steven Greer connects Obama and Clintons to ET projects

THE FOREMOST SCHOLAR ON ET’s SHOWS A CONNECTION BETWEEN BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA AND THE CLINTONS AND EXTRATERRESTIALS. LISTEN UP. IT GETS VERY VERY INTERESTING 13 MINUTES INTO THE BROADCAST.

http://www.exopoliticsradio.com/2-9-08.html

VETS BREAK SILENCE ON IRAQ WAR CRIMES

“The problem that we face in Iraq is that policymakers in leadership

have set a precedent of lawlessness where we don’t abide by the rule

 of law, we don’t respect international treaties, so when that

 atmosphere exists it lends itself to criminal activity,” argues former

 U.S. Army Sergeant Logan Laituri, who served a tour in Iraq from

2004 to 2005 before being discharged as a conscientious objector.

  

  

Vets Break Silence on Iraq War Crimes

 

By Aaron Glantz, IPS News
Posted on March 7, 2008, Printed on March 11, 2008
http://www.alternet.org/story/78352/

U.S. veterans of the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan are planning to descend on Washington from Mar. 13-16 to testify about war crimes they committed or personally witnessed in those countries.

“The war in Iraq is not covered to its potential because of how dangerous it is for reporters to cover it,” said Liam Madden, a former Marine and member of the group Iraq Veterans Against the War. “That’s left a lot of misconceptions in the minds of the American public about what the true nature of military occupation looks like.”

Iraq Veterans Against the War argues that well-publicized incidents of U.S. brutality like the Abu Ghraib prison scandal and the massacre of an entire family of Iraqis in the town of Haditha are not the isolated incidents perpetrated by “a few bad apples,” as many politicians and military leaders have claimed. They are part of a pattern, the group says, of “an increasingly bloody occupation.”

“The problem that we face in Iraq is that policymakers in leadership have set a precedent of lawlessness where we don’t abide by the rule of law, we don’t respect international treaties, so when that atmosphere exists it lends itself to criminal activity,” argues former U.S. Army Sergeant Logan Laituri, who served a tour in Iraq from 2004 to 2005 before being discharged as a conscientious objector.

Laituri told IPS that precedent of lawlessness makes itself felt in the rules of engagement handed down by commanders to soldiers on the front lines. When he was stationed in Samarra, for example, he said one of his fellow soldiers shot an unarmed man while he walked down the street.

“The problem is that that soldier was not committing a crime as you might call it because the rules of engagement were very clear that no one was supposed to be walking down the street,” he said. “But I have a problem with that. You can’t tell a family to leave everything they know so you can bomb the shit out of their house or their city. So while he definitely has protection under the law, I don’t think that legitimates that type of violence.”

Iraq Veterans Against the War is calling the gathering “Winter Soldier,” after a quote from the U.S. revolutionary Thomas Paine, who wrote in 1776: “These are the times that try men’s souls. The summer soldier and sunshine patriot will, in this crisis, shrink from the service of his country; but he that stands it now, deserves the love and thanks of man and woman.”

Organizers say video and photographic evidence will also be presented, and the testimony and panels will be broadcast live on Satellite TV and streaming video on ivaw.org.

Winter Soldier is modeled on a similar event held by Vietnam Veterans 37 years ago.

In 1971, over 100 members of Vietnam Veterans Against the War gathered in Detroit to share their stories with fellow citizens. Atrocities like the My Lai massacre had ignited popular opposition to the war, but political and military leaders insisted that such crimes were isolated exceptions.

“Initially even the My Lai massacre was denied,” notes Gerald Nicosia, whose book “Home to War” provides the most exhaustive history of the Vietnam veterans’ movement.

“The U.S. military has traditionally denied these accusations based on the fact that ‘this is a crazy soldier’ or ‘this is a malcontent’ — that you can’t trust this person. And that is the reason that Vietnam Veterans Against the War did this unified presentation in Detroit in 1971.”

“They brought together their bona fides and wore their medals and showed it was more than one or two or three malcontents. It was medal-winning, honored soldiers — veterans in a group verifying what each other said to try to convince people that these charges cannot be denied. That people are doing these things as a matter of policy.”

Nicosia says the 1971 Winter Soldier was roundly ignored by the mainstream media, but that it made an indelible imprint on those who were there.

Among those in attendance was 27-year-old Navy Lieutenant John Kerry, who had served on a Swift Boat in Vietnam. Three months after the hearings, Nicosia notes, Kerry took his case to Congress and spoke before a jammed Senate Foreign Relations Committee. Television cameras lined the walls, and veterans packed the seats.

“Many very highly decorated veterans testified to war crimes committed in Southeast Asia,” Kerry told the committee, describing the events of the Winter Soldier gathering.

“It is impossible to describe to you exactly what did happen in Detroit — the emotions in the room, and the feelings of the men who were reliving their experiences in Vietnam. They relived the absolute horror of what this country, in a sense, made them do.”

In one of the most famous antiwar speeches of the era, Kerry concluded: “Someone has to die so that President Nixon won’t be — and these are his words — ‘the first president to lose a war.’ We are asking Americans to think about that, because how do you ask a man to be the last man to die in Vietnam? How do you ask a man to be the last man to die for a mistake?”

Nicosia says U.S. citizens and veterans find themselves in a similar situation today.

“The majority of the American people are very dissatisfied with the Iraq war now and would be happy to get out of it. But Americans are bred deep into their psyches to think of America as a good country and, I think, much harder than just the hurdle of getting troops out of Iraq is to get Americans to realize the terrible things we do in the name of the United States.”

© 2008 IPS News All rights reserved.
View this story online at: http://www.alternet.org/story/78352/

McCain courts secret radical religious group

And who, exactly, is the Council for National Policy? I’m glad you asked.

U.S. News reported during the ‘04 campaign:

The supersecret Council for National Policy, founded at the onset of the Reagan era, will be meeting in New York at an undisclosed location in hopes of avoiding protesters. The thousand member group includes political heavyweights like John Ashcroft, Bill Frist, and Tom DeLay, religious leaders from Pat Robertson to James Dobson, media moguls like Steve Forbes, and conservative billionaires Howard Ahmanson and Nelson Bunker Hunt. Conservative Republicans boast that the council’s meeting is the “real” convention. “It’s the old smoke-filled room, but I wouldn’t say it’s corrupt,” says a source. “Rather it’s just where the work gets done.”

McCain Courts Secret Radical Religious Conservative Group

 

By Steve Benen, The Carpetbagger Report
Posted on March 8, 2008, Printed on March 11, 2008
http://www.alternet.org/bloggers/http://www.thecarpetbaggerreport.com//79060/

Usually, political groups trip over one another to try and gain public notoriety and attention. The Council for National Policy, meanwhile, would be perfectly happy if the public didn’t even know it exists. (I’ve long believed the easiest job on Earth would be to serve as this group’s press secretary.)

The CNP is made up of many heavy-hitters from the religious right and conservative movement in general, and they meet periodically to plot and scheme. It may sound excessively cloak-and-dagger of the group, but the CNP has a list of formal rules, one of which reads, “The media should not know when or where we meet or who takes part in our programs, before or after a meeting.”

Fortunately, details routinely leak. Today in New Orleans, for example, the CNP will gather and hear from none other than John McCain. (You know, the one who “refuses to pander” to anyone.)

Sen. John McCain, in his post-victory debut before the conservative movement’s top donors and leaders, will address the Council for National Policy’s annual winter meeting here today.

His remarks at the event, which has always been closed to the public and will have only a partial accommodation of the press this year for the first time, could turn out to be his make-or-break pitch for support from some of the right’s most influential critics of his past positions and policies.

“This is the most distinguished collection of conservative leaders and donors, and he was anxious to appear as part of his ongoing effort to consolidate support for his candidacy within the conservative movement,” said Charlie Black, Mr. McCain’s campaign adviser.

Not everyone will be glad to see him. One veteran CNP member told the far-right Washington Times, “It will say more about the state of the conservative movement than it does McCain. If he is accepted at CNP, this will mark the official end of the conservative movement as we knew it.”

And who, exactly, is the Council for National Policy? I’m glad you asked.

U.S. News reported during the ‘04 campaign:

The supersecret Council for National Policy, founded at the onset of the Reagan era, will be meeting in New York at an undisclosed location in hopes of avoiding protesters. The thousand member group includes political heavyweights like John Ashcroft, Bill Frist, and Tom DeLay, religious leaders from Pat Robertson to James Dobson, media moguls like Steve Forbes, and conservative billionaires Howard Ahmanson and Nelson Bunker Hunt.

Conservative Republicans boast that the council’s meeting is the “real” convention. “It’s the old smoke-filled room, but I wouldn’t say it’s corrupt,” says a source. “Rather it’s just where the work gets done.”

No one really knows what kind of work gets done when these wealthy, powerful right-wingers gather in their proverbial smoke-filled room. We do know that the CNP was co-founded by Tim LaHaye, who provides the Biblical analysis for the popular, right-wing “Left Behind” novels and who has worked to advance the religious right’s agenda for decades.

We also know that the CNP’s membership reads like a who’s who of some powerful far-right players. In addition to those mentioned in the U.S. News piece, readers may recognize names such as Grover Norquist, Phyllis Schlafly, and Oliver North.

Perhaps the best mainstream report on the CNP came from ABC News a couple of years ago, which described the Council as “the most powerful conservative group you’ve never heard of.”

When Steve Baldwin, the executive director of an organization with the stale-as-old-bread name of the Council for National Policy, boasts that “we control everything in the world,” he is only half-kidding.

Half-kidding, because the council doesn’t really control the world. The staff of about eight, working in a modern office building in Fairfax, Va., isn’t even enough for a real full-court basketball game.

But also half-serious because the council has deservedly attained the reputation for conceiving and promoting the ideas of many who in fact do want to control everything in the world.

As for McCain, the Washington Times added, “‘We agreed the press could sit in a separate room and listen to the speech and the questions and answers,’ a CNP official said, speaking anonymously because the rules of the council forbid officials or members to speak by name in public.”

It should be interesting. Right Wing Watch also has a good item on the CNP.

Steve Benen is a freelance writer/researcher and creator of The Carpetbagger Report. In addition, he is the lead editor of Salon.com’s Blog Report, and has been a contributor to Talking Points Memo, Washington Monthly, Crooks & Liars, The American Prospect, and the Guardian.

© 2008 The Carpetbagger Report All rights reserved.
View this story online at: http://www.alternet.org/bloggers/http://www.thecarpetbaggerreport.com//79060/

OPEN YOUR MIND: The Bell Has Rung.

Some radio shows you can listen to for free. Remember, just because the Sheep won’t believe it, doesn’t mean it shouldn’t be said. :  http://www.exopoliticsradio.com/audioarchives.html

Your New Churchy Reality Is Unfolding.

Jesus was the gift of a female Supernatural called HATHOR. Not the so called GOD you have been taught. It’s about WOMEN and the extinction thereof.  If it weren’t for the gift of Jesus, women would have become sex slaves and imprisoned in the worst kind of living hell at the hands of men of those times.  As it stands, many did not escape this picture. But, Jesus helped to shift the consciousness for 2000 years. There won’t be a true second coming my friend. There is nothing more the true Jesus can do. He already did it. Now it’s up to you.  YOU AND I HAVE SUSTAINED THIS NIGHTMARE WITH OUR CRAVING FOR COMFORT (on all levels)

The SECOND CHRIST came in 2000. It’s not ONE person really. It’s a group. It’s an agenda. It’s the BUSH STARS and the Mormon church, and Icy female half breeds who have come to be in control here. There will be the APPEARANCE of a Second Coming. You can bank on it. be prepared. It’s going to be one heck of a sound and light show. If you don’t believe in Supernaturals- you are going to be in for a real shocker very soon. Who do you think created Hurricane Katrina? www.disclosureproject.org .

It’s actually pretty complicated, and there is a lot we will never know, but you CAN know a few things.

If you want knowledge, you will need to get off main stream news. You will need to get off the paved roads that wind and bend in pre-determined routes. Get off the main road. Take the back roads.  You cannot possibly move on from THIS, without knowledge of what THIS is.

SARAH WAS RAPED BY LUCIFER. You need to understand that. At least that.

Baptisms and Votes serve the same God. They are both covenants. Here’s how it works. You get to check a box. You get to CHOOSE what you believe. The very second you check that box, you become electrically aligned with that four sqaure box of programs. You have NO IDEA what it contains in truth. You hear only what you want to hear, and what they want you to hear. You don’t know who they are. What they will do, but you checked the box, which means you have been baptised part of that person’s ID. How do you undo it? By becoming aware and willing to UNDO IT.  How you undo it is claim you are undoing it. Then, spend your days being a light in the world. Look at where you are attached to physical reality. Detach from excess attachments. Do it now.

Please recall that Obama is related to Cheney. Oh, looky there, what we found….isn’t THAT interesting. what an odd coincidence !

HILLARY CLINTON is destined (numerically) to be President. Much more so than anyone else, except Mitt Romney, who is currently out- but not down. Keep your eye on him and his company, NASA/CIA

Do you remember all the cozy plane trips with Bill Clinton and George Bush? do you honestly believe that was just a humanitarian mission? Wake up. They spent A LOT OF TIME TOGETHER in the name of Tsunami’s and Famine. Pleeeease.

 This ancient war is between Lilith and Adam. Period. And Eve. But, the true story has not been told. You have only received what the Alpha wanted you to receive. Jesus was not God’s son. Jesus is a being sent from THE VILLAGE OF MOTHERS.  Mother Mary was handpicked by a FEMALE GOD. For a reason.

Your Earth God is Lucifer. Jesus didn’t have an Alpha bone in his body. In truth, there is no such thing as gender. Stop being silly. There is only the Dominating and the Dominated and the outgrowth that supports that *IDEA*.

As you were.

At least I have planeted the seeds of truth.

By the way, this isn’t about Hillary for me. It is hard to say what Hillary really is. You can only judge by actions my friend. Hillary is an interesting breed. Perhaps the right person to pull off the greatest hoax on women.  GOOGLE ISIS. If you think for one second, these ruling men didn’t see 2008/12 coming, then you are truly not paying attention. They are not stupid. They are as cunning as they come. No need to get angry about it, but please…..KNOW THYSELF for God’s sakes.

I am not voting. I am detaching entirely from the movie.

A vote is a covenant. No one running right now- and I mean NO ONE running right now, has love in their heart for you and I. They have been hand selected. You have been spoon fed your own demise.

My best advice to you is to detach from systems, slowly and methodically, and ask the TRUE JESUS to help you do so. Understand that your vote is a REAL COVENANT.  There is HUGE power in this. They know it.

I will be over here, hugging my kids and knowing that in truth, all is well.

Lastly, the day will come soon where you will told there is no God. Yes, your true parents will be introducing themselves, as soon as the world population reaches critical mass on the truth. They will try to convince you that there is no escape from THIS. They are wrong.  But, don’t turn to the Bible to identify paradise. The true nature of the Multidimensional Universe has never been disclosed, but there are *locations of loving kindess and consciousness* far removed from 4 D.  Believe it. Be courageous. Be firm. At all cost, BE what you are. You are Mind. Not body. The body is a creation of Lucifer. But, once you wake the hell up, you can use this body as a tool for good. There isn’t much time left though. Help others.

THE RELIGIOUS RIGHT BRUTALLY EXPOSED.

  

 “What I slowly realized was that the religious-right leaders we

were helping to gain power were not ‘conservatives’ at all, in the

 old sense of the word.

They were anti-American religious revolutionaries.” 

  

Theocracy Rejected: Former Christian Right Leaders ‘Fess up

 

By Rob Boston, Church and State
Posted on March 10, 2008, Printed on March 11, 2008
http://www.alternet.org/story/78818/

Frank Schaeffer spent several years making a good living writing books promoting the Religious Right’s worldview and speaking before rapturous crowds of fundamentalist Christians.

Schaeffer, the son of evangelical guru Francis Schaeffer, was the closest thing to a rock star that politically conservative fundamentalism can offer. As the Religious Right soared in the 1980s, Schaeffer was there to ride the wave. Young, bright and charismatic, he could have founded his own Religious Right group or perhaps even launched a political career.

Twenty years have passed. What does Schaeffer think of the Religious Right today? He wouldn’t touch it with the proverbial 10-foot pole — and the feeling is mutual. A spiritual and professional crisis brought Schaeffer to the understanding that the Religious Right has it all wrong.

“My doubts really began when I realized that the people we were working with on the Religious Right were profoundly anti-American,” Schaeffer said in a recent interview. “I began to get the same vibe from them I got from my friends on the far left during the Vietnam War. They seemed to be rooting for North Vietnam. When I was working with the Religious Right, they seemed be rooting for the failure of America. Bad news was good news for them.”

Schaeffer isn’t the only ex-Religious Right activist having second thoughts these days. About 30 years ago, a young lawyer named John W. Whitehead worked alongside people like Jerry Falwell to help birth the Religious Right. Hoping to give the movement an intellectual grounding, Whitehead penned a series of books attacking the separation of church and state and demanding a government based on Christian fundamentalism.

Whitehead’s books — The Separation Illusion, The Second American Revolution and The Stealing of America — made him a popular figure in Religious Right circles. With the backing of Falwell and others, he helped found the Council for National Policy (CNP), a secretive and highly influential coalition of Religious Right groups. He also formed the Rutherford Institute, a legal group designed to promote conservative Christian causes.

Venturing into the farthest fringes of the Religious Right, Whitehead was for several years close to Rousas John Rushdoony, a leader of the Christian Reconstructionist movement that seeks to replace America’s secular republic with a theocracy based on the Old Testament’s legal codes.

Whitehead repudiated theocracy years ago. It’s unlikely he’d be welcome at a CNP meeting now.

“Politics,” he said in a recent interview, “would never even figure into Jesus’ mind. He was a homeless person. He was like Gandhi. It wasn’t in the picture. Christianity was not founded on politics. It was founded on helping the less fortunate …. That’s how you impact culture.”

Schaeffer and Whitehead are two high-profile Religious Right apostates, but they aren’t the only ones. Even Cal Thomas, who once served as vice president of the late Jerry Falwell’s Moral Majority, is critical of the Religious Right these days. Thomas in 2000 coauthored a book titled Blinded by Might: Why the Religious Right Can’t Save America.

In a column written shortly after Falwell’s death in May, Thomas opined, “The flaw in the movement was the perception that the church had become an appendage to the Republican Party and one more special interest group to be pampered. If one examines the results of the Moral Majority’s agenda, little was accomplished in the political arena and much was lost in the spiritual realm, as many came to believe that to be a Christian meant you also must be ‘converted’ to the Republican Party and adopt the GOP agenda and its tactics.”

What’s more, these critics aren’t shy about speaking out. Schaeffer details his years in the Religious Right in his recently published book Crazy for God: How I Grew Up as One Of the Elect, Helped Found the Religious Right, and Lived to Take All (or Almost All) Of It Back.

The tome is a frank tell-all loaded with broadsides against the Religious Right. Schaeffer does not hesitate to speak bluntly, as the following passages indicate:

  • “What I slowly realized was that the religious-right leaders we were helping to gain power were not ‘conservatives’ at all, in the old sense of the word. They were anti-American religious revolutionaries.”
  • “Pat Robertson would have had a hard time finding work in any job where hearing voices is not a requirement.”
  • “Long before Ralph Reed and his ilk came on the scene, Dad got sick of ‘these idiots’ as he often called people like Dobson in private. They were ‘plastic,’ Dad said, and ‘power-hungry.'”
  • “There were three kinds of evangelical leaders: The dumb or idealistic ones who really believed. The out-and-out charlatans. And the smart ones who still believed — sort of — but knew that the evangelical world was sh*t, but who couldn’t figure out any way to earn as good a living anywhere else.”

READ THE REST HERE:

http://www.alternet.org/module/printversion/78818