—He’s back in Iowa, on the campaign trail. AFTER he performed his duty, the one we elected him to do. I don’t want to hear any more excuses from CLINTON, OBAMA, BIDEN. I am nothing short of APPALLED that they didn;t get the red eye out and back in to do the right thing!!!  Too stressful? 


My God- if they can’t move their behind for THIS CAUSE, well – then neverTHEHELLmind !

Dodd- thank you- again and again.

Dodd saves the day.

Chris Dodd – thank you for your service to this country. Every single one of those democratic candidates should have come back to suppport you. IT’S SHAMEFUL.

You are a true American Hero !

GO DODD GO !!! He says NO to MuKasey (finally some spine)


Dodd Declares He Won’t Support

Mukasey, Fellow Democrats Follow His



By Marc Cooper
Posted on October 30, 2007, Printed on October 30, 2007

This post, written by Marc Cooper, originally appeared on The Huffington Post

Kudos to Chris Dodd whose third-tier-nothing-to-lose presidential campaign has sprouted him a robust pair of cojones. Dodd became the most prominent Democrat, and the first among the presidential candidates, to declare he will vote against Bush nominee Michael Mukasey’s confirmation as Attorney General.

Angered by Mukasey’s Senate testimony last week in which the former federal judge and prosecutor floated a legal “theory” that the President of the United States could, indeed, stand above constitutional statutes, Dodd declared on Monday:

“That is about as basic as it gets,” Dodd said. “You must obey the law. Everyone must.”

Dodd, along with a slew of other legal and political observers were also dismayed when Mukasey dodged Senators’ questions last week about whether or not so-called waterboarding was, in fact, a form of torture. After eluding any straight answer, Mukasey wound up making the incredulous statement that he wasn’t quite sure what was meant by the term.

Over the weekend, some leading Senate Democrats ranging from Dianne Feinstein of California to Carl Levin of Michigan engaged in their own form of equivocation, warning they might vote against Mukasey if he doesn’t properly clarify his views when he responds to written questions from the Senate later this week.

But Dodd’s bold stepping-out on this issue, rejecting any mulligan for a nominee who refuses to call torture by its proper name, seems like it might force the hand of fellow Democrats who might start looking rather silly if they don’t turn thumbs down on the newly proposed AG. Within hours of Dodd’s statement, fellow candidate and Delaware Senator Joe Biden also said he had made up his mind to vote nay. Campaign spokesmen for John Edwards and Bill Richardson also joined the chorus. And by late Monday night, the campaign of Barack Obama piled on, telling The New York Sun:

“Judge Mukasey has failed to send a clear signal that he understands the legal and moral issues that are at stake for our country, and so I cannot support him.” Mr. Obama said even a clarification from Judge Mukasey would be insufficient. “No nominee for attorney general should need a second chance to oppose torture and the unnecessary violation of civil liberties,” he said.

After this barrage, Mukasey’s nomination might be dead in the water — if you’ll excuse the pun.

UPDATE Hillary Clinton announces intention to oppose Mukasey. Read about it here.

Marc Cooper has covered international and domestic politics for the last three decades. His articles and essays have appeared in dozens of publications ranging from The New Yorker, The Atlantic and Playboy to Rolling Stone, the L.A. Times and the Village Voice.

© 2007 Independent Media Institute. All rights reserved.
View this story online at: